I havent measured it, but it is probably way past blindingly fast. (Apple says 3GBsecond) The problem is that most media projects today far exceed 1TB in storage.This article is designed to help you make more informed decisions when you dont have an unlimited budget.
Upgrading Pro For 4K Editing Mac Pro IsAlso, while the iMac Pro is designed for many different markets, Im focusing here on digital media.It will be blindingly fast, it will work great and youll have enormous bragging rights.But if money IS an object, then you need to make trade-offs, balancing the performance you need with the money you have. The good news is that you dont need to buy the top-of-the-line to get a system today that can meet your editing needs for the next several years. This includes an all-64-bit architecture, optimization for core technologies including Metal, tight integration with both CPU and GPU and the ability to take advantage of faster IO both to the processors and storage. Instead, Apples media apps take advantage of whatever technology or performance benefits are provided in the hardware. In other words, there are no new features in FCP X that appear if it is running on an iMac Pro. If you principally work with SD or HD material, an iMac will be perfectly fine. The performance benefits of the iMac Pro dont justify the expense. So everything you see on a current iMac looks the same on the iMac Pro. It has enhanced external connectivity and more Thunderbolt 3 ports (so you still have Thunderbolt ports left over for other accessories after connecting a display). However, for most of the editing that most of us are doing, we dont need to buy the top-of-the-line system to get significantly improved editing performance. For example, H.264 compression takes advantage of a hardware encoder that is built into all current Macs. However, there are benefits to more cores, especially when decoding and encoding heavily threaded codecs like ProRes or HEVC. Also, the 10-core system offers a higher Turbo Boost speed of 4.5GHz versus 4.2GHz for the 8-core CPU. I would invest my money elsewhere in the system because video editors will see greater benefits in upgrading RAM and GPU when using Final Cut Pro on an iMac Pro. What I discovered is that, even more than the Mac Pro, the iMac Pro internals are designed specifically to dissipate heat under heavy load. It is also worth noting that it does all this while still being super quiet (it is an iMac, after all), letting you focus on your work. Increasingly, both FCP X and Premiere rely on the GPU for more and more tasks. Whether you use Motion, After Effects, Premiere or Final Cut, investing in the best GPU will be a wise choice. ![]() Also, more VRAM offers benefits when working with large frame sizes, multiple video streams (i.e. I havent measured it, but it is probably way past blindingly fast. Apple says 3GBsecond) The problem is that most media projects today far exceed 1TB in storage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |